HUMAN-CENTERED PRODUCT PLANNING AND DESIGN:DESIGN ISSUES

By -

DESIGN ISSUES

This chapter presents an overall framework and systematic methodology for pursuing the above three objectives of human-centered design. There are four design issues of particular concern within this framework.

The first concern is formulating the right problem—making sure that system objectives and re- quirements are right. All too often, these issues are dealt with much too quickly. There is a natural tendency to ‘‘get on with it,’’ which can have enormous negative consequences when requirements are later found to be inadequate or inappropriate.

The second issue is designing an appropriate solution. All well-engineered solutions are not necessarily appropriate. Considering the three objectives of human-centered design, as well as the broader context within which systems typically operate, it is apparent that the excellence of the technical attributes of a design are necessary but not sufficient to ensure that the system design is appropriate and successful.

Given the right problem and an appropriate solution, the next concern is developing it to perform well. Performance attributes should include operability, maintainability, and supportability—that is, using it, fixing it, and supplying it. Supportability includes spare parts, fuel, and, most importantly, trained personnel.

The fourth design concern is ensuring human satisfaction. Success depends on people using the system and achieving the benefits for which it was designed. However, before a system can be used, it must be purchased, usually by other stakeholders, which in turn depends on it being technically approved by yet other stakeholders. Thus, a variety of types of people have to be satisfied.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DUALITY THEORY:THE ESSENCE OF DUALITY THEORY

By -
Image
THE ESSENCE OF DUALITY THEORY Given our standard form for the primal problem at the left (perhaps after conversion from another form), its dual problem has the form shown to the right. Thus, with the primal problem in maximizatio n form, the dual problem is in minimization form instead. Furthermore, the dual problem uses exactly the same pa r amete r s as the primal problem, but in different locations, as summarized below. 1. The coefficients in the objective function of the primal problem are the right-hand sides of the functional constraints in the dual problem. 2. The right-hand sides of the functional constraints in the primal problem are the coef- ficients in the objective function of the dual problem. 3. The coefficients of a variable in the functional constraints of the primal problem are the coefficients in a functional constraint of the dual problem. To highlight the comparison, now look at these same two problems in matrix notation (as introduced at the beginn...
Read more

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION MODELS:THE MINIMUM SPANNING TREE PROBLEM

By -
Image
THE MINIMUM SPANNING TREE PROBLEM The minimum spanning tree problem bears some similarities to the main version of the shortest-path problem presented in the preceding section. In both cases, an undi r ecte d and connected network is being considered, where the given information includes some mea- sure of the positive length (distance, cost, time, etc.) associated with each link. Both problems also involve choosing a set of links that have the shortest total length among all sets of links that satisfy a certain property. For the shortest-path problem, this property is that the chosen links must provide a path between the origin and the destination. For the minimum spanning tree problem, the required property is that the chosen links must provide a path between ea c h pair of nodes. The minimum spanning tree problem can be summarized as follows: 1. You are given the nodes of a network but not the links. Instead, you are given the po- tential links and the positive length for each ...
Read more

INTEGER PROGRAMMING:THE BRANCH-AND-CUT APPROACH TO SOLVING BIP PROBLEMS

By -
TH E BRANCH-AND-CUT APPROACH TO SOLVING BIP PROBLEMS Integer programming has been an especially exciting area of OR since the mid-1980s be- cause of the dramatic progress being made in its solution methodology. Background To place this progress into perspective, consider the historical background. One big break- through had come in the 1960s and early 1970s with the development and refinement of the branch-and-bound approach. But then the state of the art seemed to hit a plateau. Rel- atively small problems (well under 100 variables) could be solved very efficiently, but even a modest increase in problem size might cause an explosion in computation time be- yond feasible limits. Little progress was being made in overcoming this exponential growth in computation time as the problem size was increased. Many important problems arising in practice could not be solved. Then came the next breakthrough in the mid-1980s, with the introduction of the b r an c h- and-cu t approach to sol...
Read more