NETWORK OPTIMIZATION MODELS:SELECTED REFERENCES

By -

SELECTED REFERENCES

1. Bazaraa, M. S., J. J. Jarvis, and H. D. Sherali: Linear Programming and Network Flows, 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010.

2. Bertsekas, D. P.: Network Optimization: Continuous and Discrete Models, Athena Scientific Pub- lishing, Belmont, MA, 1998.

3. Cai, X., and C. K. Wong: Time Varying Network Optimization, Springer, New York, 2007.

4. Dantzig, G. B., and M. N. Thapa: Linear Programming 1: Introduction, Springer, New York, 1997, chap. 9.

5. Hillier, F. S., and M. S. Hillier: Introduction to Management Science: A Modeling and Case Stud- ies Approach with Spreadsheets, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL, 2014, chap. 6.

6. Sierksma, G., and D. Ghosh: Networks in Action:Text and Computer Exercises in Network Optimization, Springer, New York, 2010.

7. Vanderbei, R. J.: Linear Programming: Foundations and Extensions, 4th ed., Springer, New York, 2014, chaps. 14 and 15.

8. Whittle, P.: Networks: Optimization and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.

Some Award-Winning Applications of Network Optimization Models:

(A link to all these articles is provided on our website, www.mhhe.com/hillier.)

A1. Ben-Khedher, N., J. Kintanar, C. Queille, and W. Stripling: “Schedule Optimization at SNCF: From Conception to Day of Departure,” Interfaces, 28(1): 6–23, January–February 1998.

A2. Cosares, S., D. N. Deutsch, I. Saniee, and O. J. Wasem: “SONET Toolkit: A Decision-Support System for Designing Robust and Cost-Effective Fiber-Optic Networks,” Interfaces, 25(1): 20–40, January–February 1995.

A3. Fleuren, H., C. Goossens, M. Hendriks, M.-C. Lombard, I. Meuffels, and J. Poppelaars: “Supply Chain-Wide Optimization at TNT Express,” Interfaces, 43(1): 5–20, January– February 2013.

A4. Gorman, M. F., D. Acharya, and D. Sellers: “CSX Railway Uses OR to Cash In on Optimized Equipment Distribution,” Interfaces, 40(1): 5–16, January–February 2010.

A5. Huisingh, J. L., H. M. Yamauchi, and R. Zimmerman, “Saving Federal Tax Dollars,” Inter- faces, 31(5): 13–23, September–October 2001.

A6. Klingman, D., N. Phillips, D. Steiger, and W. Young: “The Successful Deployment of Management Science throughout Citgo Petroleum Corporation,” Interfaces, 17(1): 4–25, January–February 1987.

A7. Prior, R. C., R. L. Slavens, J. Trimarco, V. Akgun, E. G. Feitzinger, and C.-F. Hong: “Menlo World- wide Forwarding Optimizes Its Network Routing,” Interfaces, 34(1): 26–38, January–February 2004.

A8. Srinivasan, M. M., W. D. Best, and S. Chandrasekaran: “Warner Robins Air Logistics Center Streamlines Aircraft Repair and Overhaul,” Interfaces, 37(1): 7–21, January–February 2007.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DUALITY THEORY:THE ESSENCE OF DUALITY THEORY

By -
Image
THE ESSENCE OF DUALITY THEORY Given our standard form for the primal problem at the left (perhaps after conversion from another form), its dual problem has the form shown to the right. Thus, with the primal problem in maximizatio n form, the dual problem is in minimization form instead. Furthermore, the dual problem uses exactly the same pa r amete r s as the primal problem, but in different locations, as summarized below. 1. The coefficients in the objective function of the primal problem are the right-hand sides of the functional constraints in the dual problem. 2. The right-hand sides of the functional constraints in the primal problem are the coef- ficients in the objective function of the dual problem. 3. The coefficients of a variable in the functional constraints of the primal problem are the coefficients in a functional constraint of the dual problem. To highlight the comparison, now look at these same two problems in matrix notation (as introduced at the beginn
Read more

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION MODELS:THE MINIMUM SPANNING TREE PROBLEM

By -
Image
THE MINIMUM SPANNING TREE PROBLEM The minimum spanning tree problem bears some similarities to the main version of the shortest-path problem presented in the preceding section. In both cases, an undi r ecte d and connected network is being considered, where the given information includes some mea- sure of the positive length (distance, cost, time, etc.) associated with each link. Both problems also involve choosing a set of links that have the shortest total length among all sets of links that satisfy a certain property. For the shortest-path problem, this property is that the chosen links must provide a path between the origin and the destination. For the minimum spanning tree problem, the required property is that the chosen links must provide a path between ea c h pair of nodes. The minimum spanning tree problem can be summarized as follows: 1. You are given the nodes of a network but not the links. Instead, you are given the po- tential links and the positive length for each
Read more

NETWORK OPTIMIZATION MODELS:THE SHORTEST-PATH PROBLEM

By -
Image
THE SHORTEST-PATH PROBLEM Although several other versions of the shortest-path problem (including some for directed networks) are mentioned at the end of the section, we shall focus on the following simple version. Consider an undi r ecte d and connected network with two special nodes called the origin and the destination. Associated with each of the links (undirected arcs) is a non- negative distance. The objective is to find the shortest path (the path with the minimum total distance) from the origin to the destination. A relatively straightforward algorithm is available for this problem. The essence of this procedure is that it fans out from the origin, successively identifying the shortest path to each of the nodes of the network in the ascending order of their (shortest) distances from the origin, thereby solving the problem when the destination node is reached. We shall first outline the method and then illustrate it by solving the shortest-path problem encountered by the See
Read more